Next, the various sociodemographic and relationship variables, which were referred in literature as being relevant with regards to their influence on personal commitment, were controlled through the analysis of covariance, in order to verify the permanence, or not, of the relationship status effect. It was thus verified that the effect of the relationship status variable remained significant, even when controlling for the influence of the variables gender F(3, 920) = 9.62; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .03 religiousness, F(3, 920) = 7.92; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .03, relationship quality, F(3, 920) = ; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .07, and total duration of the relationship, F(3, 920) = 7.09; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .02. In order to evaluate possible interference originating from the application of the questionnaires (online vs. pencil and paper), this variable was controlled in order to assess the permanence of the relationship status effect. 90; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .03.
The outcome for this reason recommend that people in the a formal home-based relationships, while they try secure cohabitation relationship, try described as a shorter secure level of private funding than try marriage ceremonies
The modern studies tried to contribute toward study of individual union, from the verifying the fresh new Portuguese style of the Connection Scale, the personal Union Level (ECP–Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal) towards a sample out-of 924 people that were employed in romantic relationship and also by examining the influence of numerous relationship statuses to the it.