I found Swami Satchidananda’s version preciso be informative and somewhat blunt – and I mean that con verso good way. He uses per few modern examples throughout the text puro help improve the reader’s understanding. This book was originally published per 1978 and the addirittura Personally, I’ve only read 2 others before reading this version, so my point of reference may be considered narrow.
I found Swami Satchidananda’s version preciso be informative and somewhat blunt – and I mean that con per good way. He uses verso few modern examples throughout the text to help improve the reader’s understanding. This book was originally published in 1978 and the examples he uses still apply (both ironic and sad).
I read one or two sutras before each yoga practice
His attempt to explain the overall concept of “never-ending consciousness” that is a key part of the spirituality of Yoga felt a bit incomplete, or at the very least, confusing. His use of the word God to symbolize said consciousness made it hard esatto distinguish between the Christian concept of God and the yogic concept of consciousness/God/Light . etc.
Swami summarizes and skips over excretion sutras entirely within Books 3 & 4. Notably, these are the 2 of the datingranking.net/it/catholic-singles-review/ 4 books that most authors summarize because they have less day-to-day useful knowledge, so his choice is common.
Personally, I am very happy that I took the time sicuro read this interpretation of the Yoga Sutras and I’d widely recommend it preciso others, especially those delving into the world of teaching Yoga.