arkadaslik-uygulamalari ?st ba?lant? alanlar?

In the event your dating is actually observed to get reasonable, both people might possibly be found

In the event your dating is actually observed to get reasonable, both people might possibly be found

  • Sampling phase: examining the advantages and you may costs away from relationships (just intimate matchmaking) through experimentation
  • Negotiating stage: the start of a romance, where individuals can cost you and you can rewards are known through exchange and you may settlement
  • Commitment stage: will cost you and benefits be more foreseeable as well as the matchmaking grows more stable- benefits increase, can cost you protect against
  • Institutionalisation stage: the fresh norms of your matchmaking was solidly oriented
  • This has been debated that financial change characterises low-personal relationships (instance anywhere between work colleagues), but never characterise personal relationships, while the neither partner features ‘score’ out of that is in the future and you can trailing with the benefits and you can can cost you. Lay may be predicated on a flawed expectation that is ergo weak.
  • Miller (1997) found that people who ranked by themselves to be during the a loyal dating invested less time looking at photographs away from glamorous somebody, suggesting one to dissatisfaction into the a romance is really what causes the brand new costs/rewards getting calculated, rather than the calculation resulting in disappointment. It weakens this new anticipate of Lay.
  • There clearly was proof one tips away from equity become more essential in dating than computation out of costs and you will advantages, recommending that Put are, at best, a finite reason from romantic dating.

Equity Principle

Equity: So it identifies fairness. Walster et al (1978) ideal one what’s essential is the fact that the quantity of ‘profit’ during the a love is approximately equivalent for couples. If it’s not, the other spouse overbenefits, together with almost every other underbenefits, which may produce resentment and you can anger in the ‘underbenefitted’ spouse, thus threatening the partnership.

The level of benefits and you will prices are perhaps not considered matter predicated on it concept. What matters ‘s the proportion among them- spending a lot in a romance is appropriate, provided the level of advantages was large. Rewarding relationships are characterised of the transactions to make certain equity, although not always equality, between the shipments regarding perks.

Consequences out of inequity: In the event the a partner invests a lot into the a love, however, gets nothing from it, they will become upset. You will find a relationship between your level of understood inequity additionally the number of disappointment. The overbenefitted and you may underbenefitted mate have a tendency to see the inequity. This new effect from inequity can change over time, like, contributing over what’s received tends to be acceptable in the beginning inside a love, but could well be regarded as unfair whether or not it continues having an excellent considerable length of time. To manage the brand new inequity, someone will get keep working harder to try and fix security. As an alternative, a partner get cognitively revision the attitudes out-of what matters once the advantages and you may costs, therefore the dating relates to be seen because of the her or him once the fair, regardless if little provides most changed.

  • Utne mais aussi al (1984) learned that lovers who noticed its relationships equitable was basically together with significantly more satisfied as opposed to those exactly who advertised on their own because the underbenfitting otherwise overbenefitting, thus supporting the predictions away from security concept.
  • Aumer-Ryan ainsi que al (2007) found social variations in the web link ranging from collateral and pleasure. Those in collectivist countries have been prone to feel fulfilled whenever overbenefitting within the a romance, while in individualist societies equity try even more of pleasure. This suggests collateral concept tends to be quicker applicable in different cultures.
  • Huseman et al (1987) believe not all the people are worried about the necessity for security. Some need a lot more satisfaction out of adding more to help you a romance, while someone else are prepared to ‘overbenefit’ without guilt. This weakens the concept, as it does not account for individual differences.

Rusbult’s Money Design

Rusbult ainsi que al (2011) suggested you to definitely relationship is a vital reason behind dating, dealing with the latest intent or need to keep the relationship (trusting it getting a future)mitment try impacted by the next things.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.