Just as verso rabbi may not https://datingranking.net/it/silverdaddy-review/ permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not sicuro forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if verso rabbi must forbid something merely because of a question of law, because of verso custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not onesto establish an erroneous precedent.
Nevertheless, it is forbidden for verso city preciso split into two congregations primarily because of verso dispute over law or practice
Per rabbi should be careful not onesto render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead to erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only sopra the case of verso scholar, and which may not be taught sicuro the ignorant.
When per rabbi renders verso decision mediante a case sopra which there are giammai clear precedents, he must strive esatto bring as many proofs as possible…
When verso rabbi renders verso decision per a question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when verso rabbi decides on per case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.
Since the initial decision renders the subject of a case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by per greater sage or by a majority rule.
An erroneous decision cannot render a case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able esatto spettacolo that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.
Similarly, per decision that is retracted with good reason does not render verso case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able to determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi preciso retract his decision and permit the case in question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for per rabbi preciso reverse even his own decision…
Sopra order puro prevent controversy, one should not present a case before verso rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.
One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision puro be erroneous
Although the Torah demands verso un degree of uniformity in practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions per minor questions of Torah law.
However, where there is per niente geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable puro be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within per solo community, the Torah requires verso high degree of uniformity in religious practice. Durante in nessun caso case should it be made sicuro appear that there is more than one Torah.
It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden preciso mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited esatto mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Esatto do so is preciso disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.
It is therefore forbidden for members of per scapolo congregation to form factions, each following verso different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for per scapolo rabbinical breviligne onesto issue verso split decision.
However, where per city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical court, the following of each one is counted as verso separate community, and each one may follow different practices.